I. A. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2024) - mischaracterization of VE testimony, borderline age, RFC, medical opinion Past relevant work – as

Past relevant work – as generally performed

1)  The step four determination is not supported by substantial evidence

The Rulings are at your fingertips

Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Weight of VA disability finding

I. A. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2024) - mischaracterization of VE testimony, borderline age, RFC, medical opinion Past relevant work – asI. A. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 23 20999 RBK (D. N. J. Apr. 26, 2024) (Order by U. S. District Judge Robert B. Kugler) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC required findings RFC lack of support for findings Age categories mechanical application Vocational testimony mischaracterization of record Remand for an award of benefits delay Rulings addressed: Social Security Ruling 96 8p Social Security Ruling 96 9p Social