[Robert U.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. June 5, 2023) - SDM, RFC, medical opinions, subjective symptoms Age categories - mechanical application

Age categories - mechanical application

4)  The ALJ did not provide sufficient rationale for discrediting Robert M

adopted by Christina A

Appellant’s Reply Brief and court decision

highlighting

[Robert U.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. June 5, 2023) - SDM, RFC, medical opinions, subjective symptoms Age categories - mechanical application[Robert U.] v. Commr of Soc. Sec., No. 2: 22 CV 241 MAP, 2023 WL 3815256 (M. D. Fla. June 5, 2023) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Memorandum and Plaintiffs Reply Memorandum Topics addressed: Specific impairments: evaluation of anxiety Specific impairments: social phobia RFC interacting with with co workers, supervisors and the public RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC work