[Angelo R.] v. Saul, 796 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2020) - improper reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, composite job 2) The ALJ’s mental residual

2) The ALJ’s mental residual functional capacity assessment is not supported by substantial evidence

Commissioner

and reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded with instructions to grant disability benefits

The court found the undisputed evidence compels the conclusion that Appellant was unable to sustain full-time work — eight hours a day

putting on clothes in the morning

[Angelo R.] v. Saul, 796 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2020) - improper reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, composite job 2) The ALJ’s mental residualngelo R]. v. Saul, 796 F. Appx 49 (2d Cir. 2020) (Decision by Rosemary S. Pooler and Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judges, and District Judge Jesse M. Furman, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation) Briefs Included: Appellants Initial Brief and Appellants Reply Brief Topics addressed: RFC lack of support for findings RFC reliance on ALJs lay interpretation of the record Past relevant work required